Skip to main content

Dark Waters movie - is that actually what happened with DuPont and the contamination

Veteran · · 23 views
Watched that Dark Waters flick last night with the wife and it got me thinking about industrial stuff and what companies actually get away with. That movie about the lawyer going after DuPont over the PFOA contamination in West Virginia, that's a real case right. Not Hollywood fiction.

I'm asking because a lot of what I see with meso cases feels similar. Companies knew asbestos was killing people and just kept it quiet for decades. DuPont knew their chemicals were poisoning the water supply and dumped it anyway. Same playbook, different chemical.

The movie's based on the actual lawsuit against DuPont from the late 90s and 2000s. Rob Bilott was a real lawyer who took on the case. The contamination at Parkersburg was real. All of it actually happened. They settled for like 650 million or something but the point is it took years and years of fighting to get them to admit what they'd done.

Makes you wonder what other stuff companies are sitting on right now that we don't know about yet. With asbestos at least we know now. With meso you've got documentation going back to the 1930s showing they knew it was dangerous. The Navy knew. The shipbuilders knew. My outfit on the Oriskany in 1971 had asbestos all over the place and nobody said a word about it.

Anyway if you're looking at a legal case for your exposure that movie's actually a decent way to understand how these things work. It's not quick and it's not easy but the documentation and the evidence can add up.

10 Replies

Patient
Yeah that movie nailed it. And you're spot on about the playbook being the same. I didn't serve on a ship but I was turning wrenches on cars for thirty years, brake pads and clutches, and nobody ever told me what I was breathing in. Found out later that stuff was loaded with asbestos the whole time.

The thing that gets me is the documentation. Like you said, they KNEW. I've seen some of the old brake pad boxes from the 70s and 80s in my case files and there's stuff buried in there showing the manufacturers had test results going back decades. They just kept selling it anyway because the liability was cheaper than switching materials, I guess.

I got diagnosed last December, had my surgery in February and so far so good. But the legal side of it... that's a whole different engine. Takes time. You gotta gather your work history, exposure timeline, medical records, and yeah it's frustrating when you're trying to deal with the actual disease at the same time. But the evidence really does add up if you're patient about it.

Dark Waters is worth watching if you're dealing with this stuff. Shows you it's not some crazy conspiracy theory we're talking about. It's just how big companies operated and a lot of them still do. The difference now is we know what asbestos does so at least we can actually prove what happened to us.
Veteran
Yeah, the difference is we've got the smoking gun paperwork from the Navy itself. VA's got records showing they knew about asbestos on the ships in the 70s and 80s but nobody briefed us on it. That's what makes the claim easier to prove than some of these civilian cases.
Veteran
Yeah that's all real. Bilott actually took on DuPont starting in the late 90s and it dragged on forever. The thing about Dark Waters is they actually toned down some of it. The contamination at Parkersburg was worse than what they showed.

But you nailed it on the asbestos angle. Same exact playbook. We had it everywhere on the Oriskany. Pipe insulation, boiler rooms, compartments you'd work in for 8 hour stretches doing maintenance. Nobody told us anything about it. I didn't even know I had pleural meso until June when the VA ran a routine screening. Sixty years after my discharge and that's when it showed up.

The documentation piece is huge. When I went through the legal process after my diagnosis, turns out the Navy had studies going back to the 1930s like you said. They knew. Shipbuilders knew. Manufacturers knew. All documented. That's what matters in these cases. Not what people remember or what they claim they told you. The paper trail.

My advice if you're looking at a case, get copies of everything. Service records, employment records, medical records. We got ours pulled together by August 2025 and that's what made the difference. The lawyers can work with actual documents. They can't work with vague memories.

It's not quick. My pleurectomy was in August and I'm still doing followup stuff. But yeah the evidence adds up if it's there.
Family
Yeah, that parallel is spot on. My dad's case has the same vibe where you dig through decades of internal memos and suddenly there's a 1952 memo saying "yeah we know this stuff causes cancer" and they just... kept using it anyway.
Veteran
Yeah that's exactly it. Those memos are gold when you find them. Your old man's got documentation like that, his case is stronger than he probably thinks. The companies can't argue they didn't know when there's a paper trail going back that far. We've got similar stuff from the shipyard records on the Oriskany, dates back to when they were literally using asbestos for insulation and fireproofing. Hard to claim ignorance when it's all written down in black and white from 1952.
Attorney Expert Response
Sarah mentioned the 1952 memo and that's exactly the kind of document that changes everything in these cases. We've actually seen internal industry correspondence from as far back as 1934 where manufacturers were tracking worker lung disease rates and deliberately keeping that data out of published literature. The Saranac Lake studies, the Sumner Simpson papers... companies fought for decades to keep those buried.

What Dark Waters captured well, and what Rob Bilott's actual book goes into more, is that the documentation doesn't just prove knowledge. It proves a decision was made. There's a difference legally between "we didn't know" and "we knew and calculated it was cheaper to pay out claims than change operations." That second one tends to land very differently with juries.

The Oriskany mention hits home. Jurisdiction matters a lot here because veterans' asbestos claims can run through multiple pathways, VA benefits, state tort, federal maritime law, sometimes simultaneously. Each has different statutes of limitations and different standards of proof. Worth talking to someone who specifically handles maritime exposure cases, not just general asbestos work.
3 found this helpful
Veteran
Yeah that's exactly what I'm talking about. The stuff they knew and just buried it. 1934, that's almost a hundred years ago and they still had to drag it all out in court. Makes you angry when you think about it, all those guys on the ships who had no idea what was happening to them.

The memos are huge I get that. My VA lawyer mentioned some of that documentation when we were going through my case after the diagnosis. Hard to argue with your own paperwork saying you knew people were getting sick.
Veteran
Yeah that movie nails it. Dark Waters is pretty much what went down, Bilott really did take those guys on and it was a grind. The PFOA thing in West Virginia is real and yeah, same playbook we're seeing with asbestos. Knew it, hid it, kept making money.

I'm at Stage II pleural right now, diagnosed October last year after a cough that wouldn't quit. Got exposed at Camp Lejeune 1978 to 1982 in those barracks that were basically wrapped in asbestos insulation, plus time on the Iwo Jima. Filed my VA claim in November and I'm still waiting on them to move. Had surgery in December to get what they could out of my chest.

The documentation angle is huge. There's stuff from the 1930s showing they knew. The Navy knew. Manufacturers knew. But getting companies to actually admit it and pay for it takes exactly what you saw in that movie, which is years of evidence and pressure. My case is still early but I've already got my medical records from the surgery and the exposure history locked down. That matters.

One thing I'll say about the VA side of this, don't wait on them if you've got military exposure. Get a civilian doctor to document everything separate from the VA process. I wish I'd done that sooner. The VA moves at its own speed and meanwhile you need actual treatment lined up.

The anger part of this is real. They knew and they just let it happen to us. But channeling that into getting your case solid is what counts now.
Veteran
Yeah H., that cough is the one that gets you. Mine started same way back in March, thought it was just something that wouldn't clear up. Camp Lejeune and the Iwo Jima, man that's solid documentation right there. Military records are gonna be your friend in this thing because they actually logged where you were and when. A lot of civilian guys don't have that advantage. You filing with the VA or going the legal route or both?
Patient
Yeah, that movie actually tracks pretty closely with what happened. The PFOA case is real and you're right about the parallels. I've been doing a lot of reading on this stuff since my diagnosis last month and the pattern is almost identical with asbestos. Companies had internal memos going back decades showing they knew the health risks. Johns-Manville, which is where I worked from 78 to 85, literally had studies in the 1930s documenting the dangers and they just... kept operating like nothing was wrong.

What gets me is the timeline. DuPont's PFOA contamination took years to litigate and even then most people affected didn't see settlements until way later. With mesothelioma you're looking at a similar lag. I was exposed over forty years ago and didn't get diagnosed until last November. By then the company's already calculated that most of us will die before we can pursue anything substantial. It's morbid but that's the actual math they're working with.

The documentation angle you mentioned is huge though. I've been requesting my employment records and any medical screening stuff from the plant and there's actually more on file than you'd expect. Some of it's surprising in how explicit they were about knowing. It doesn't necessarily make the legal side easier but it does show intent, which apparently matters a lot.

If you're looking at a case just make sure whoever you talk to has experience with occupational exposure specifically. The PFOA settlements took so long partly because it was environmental contamination affecting the general public. Occupational cases can actually move faster because the exposure pathway is clearer. That's what I'm learning anyway as I'm evaluating HIPEC surgery options and trying to figure out the legal side simultaneously.

Share Your Experience

Sign in or create a free account to share your experience.

Discussions in this community are for informational and emotional support purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, medical advice, or an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. Community Guidelines

Call Now: (800) 400-1805 Free Case Review • Available 24/7