Skip to main content

Timeline question - when do you actually need to file? worried about statute of limitations

Family · · 52 views
So my FIL was diagnosed with pleural meso about 8 months ago and we're still kind of in treatment mode, honestly. Stage IV so we're doing chemo right now and trying to keep him stable. But I've been doing some research because I know there's a clock on these cases and I'm getting confused about when it actually starts ticking.

I know there's a statute of limitations but I've read conflicting stuff online. Is it from when he was exposed? From when he got diagnosed? From when symptoms started? Because those are three completely different timelines and I don't want us to miss a deadline while we're focused on keeping him alive.

Also, I found out his dad worked at a shipyard in Long Beach back in the early 80s and we have some old pay stubs but I'm not sure if that's enough for documentation or if we need more. The exposure was like 40 years ago so tracking down old coworkers or records feels impossible.

I'm not even sure we want to pursue this right now honestly, we're just trying to get through treatment and have him here longer. But I also don't want to accidentally lose the option because we waited too long. Does anyone know if you need to file before starting treatment or if there's wiggle room there?

Thanks for any insight.

9 Replies

Patient
The statute typically starts from diagnosis, not exposure or when symptoms showed up, so that's the good news. Your FIL has time. Different states have different windows though and that's where it gets tricky. Ohio gives you two years from diagnosis which sounds generous until you realize how fast that goes.

The pay stubs from Long Beach are actually solid starting documentation. We had similar stuff from the Johns-Manville plant where I worked back in '78-'85 and my legal team said employment records beat nothing. You don't need to track down coworkers necessarily, there are asbestos exposure databases now that can cross-reference shipyard work with known contamination. I learned that the hard way by spending weeks trying to find guys I hadn't talked to in 40 years.

Here's what I'd honestly say though. You don't file anything while he's in active treatment. That would be adding stress nobody needs right now. What you DO do is get a consultation with someone who handles these cases, no cost upfront, and just lock in the timeline. Let them worry about the deadline. Once you know what state's law applies and when the actual cutoff is, you can breathe. We got our consultation done in November when I was diagnosed and honestly it let us focus on the HIPEC surgery evaluation instead of panicking about paperwork.

The documentation gathering can happen whenever. Doesn't have to be now. Your job right now is keeping your FIL stable, that's it.
Veteran
Look, I get the worry about the clock running out. Statute of limitations on these cases usually starts from diagnosis, not exposure. So your FIL's got time to breathe a little bit even though I know that doesn't feel true when you're in the middle of chemo.

Here's what I learned going through this myself. When I filed my VA claim back in November, right after my October diagnosis, the VA guy told me the statute varies by state but California gives you a few years from when you got diagnosed. Not from when you got exposed at that shipyard in '82 or whenever. That's the key thing nobody explains clearly online. So if your FIL was diagnosed 8 months ago, he's still well within the window. You're not gonna miss it by taking time to get him stable first.

The pay stubs from Long Beach are actually solid documentation to start with. That's more than a lot of guys have honestly. I had medical records from Camp Lejeune saying asbestos in the water back in 1978-1982 but finding actual exposure documentation was harder than you'd think. The shipyard probably has records if someone needs to pull them later, and there are people who specialize in tracking down old employment stuff for exactly this reason.

And no, you don't need to file before treatment. I had my surgery in December after filing in November. The timing of the case and the timing of treatment are separate things. You can absolutely focus on keeping him here and stable first. That's the priority.

Don't let anyone pressure you into rushing this while you're still in treatment mode. Just don't sit on it for years either once he's more stable. But right now, get him through chemo.
Attorney Expert Response
Good news on the statute of limitations question: in California, the clock typically starts from the date of diagnosis, not exposure. So that 40-year-old shipyard work doesn't start the timer. The California Code of Civil Procedure section 340.2 is the specific statute here, and it gives one year from diagnosis for the injured party to file. That said, this varies by state and by claim type, so please don't treat that as the final word for your situation.

The Long Beach shipyard in the early 80s is actually a well-documented exposure site. We've seen cases where pay stubs alone were enough to establish employment history and get the investigation started. Seriously, those pay stubs may be more valuable than you think. The asbestos trust funds that exist for many of these manufacturers have their own claims processes with different deadlines than court filings, and some trusts have extended timelines.

Here's what I've seen happen with families in treatment mode: they consult with an attorney early just to understand the deadlines, don't file anything yet, and it takes maybe one phone call to protect the option. You don't have to be "in lawsuit mode" to have that conversation. Treatment absolutely comes first.

One thing worth knowing, roughly 60 to 70 percent of mesothelioma cases settle through trust funds rather than going to trial, so the process may be less disruptive than people fear.

Consult an attorney for your specific situation, especially given the California jurisdictional details here.
3 found this helpful
Family
man i get it, trying to keep your head above water while all this legal stuff is hanging over you. my brother got diagnosed about a year ago and i was in the same boat, just trying to figure out what matters right now versus what we gotta worry about later.

so from what we learned, the clock usually starts from when he got diagnosed, not from exposure or symptoms. that's the key thing. so you've got time, especially since he's only 8 months in. but here's the thing - different states have different rules and Tennessee might be different than California where the shipyard was, so that matters.

the long beach shipyard thing is actually pretty solid documentation wise. those pay stubs are gold because they show he was there and when. we had similar old paperwork from my brother's job back in the 70s and the lawyers said that was helpful. you probably don't need to track down coworkers or anything crazy like that, just proof he was exposed.

honestly don't stress about filing before treatment. we didn't even talk to anyone about the legal side until like month 6 when my brother's oncologist said the prognosis wasn't great. by then we knew we wanted to look into it. you can take your time with this stuff while you focus on getting him through chemo. the statute isn't gonna sneak up on you if you're keeping an eye on it.

when you do decide to move forward just call some of the lawyers who handle this. most of them do free consultations and they can tell you exactly what the deadline is in your situation. but right now just focus on treatment.
Veteran
Long Beach shipyard, yeah that's solid documentation right there. Pay stubs are good but get his old union card or any safety records if they're still around, those carry weight. Don't stress about filing while he's in treatment, you've got time to handle it proper.
Veteran
One thing I'd push back on a little - don't sleep on filing even while he's in treatment. I know it sounds like adding stress when you're already maxed out, but here's what happened with me. Got diagnosed October 2025, had surgery in December, and I waited until November to file my VA claim because I figured I'd get through the medical stuff first. Big mistake. The VA takes forever to process and now I'm sitting here in March still waiting for them to move on it. If your FIL's got the shipyard exposure documented like you said, getting the paperwork started now doesn't mean he has to do anything else or make any decisions about actually pursuing it. It just gets the clock started on their end instead of yours. The Long Beach shipyard stuff from the early 80s is exactly the kind of exposure history they look for anyway. Frank's right about the union card if he had one. I served at Camp Lejeune 1978-1982 with asbestos everywhere in the barracks and even that's harder to prove than a civilian shipyard job with actual employment records. You've got better documentation than most people in his situation honestly.
Attorney Expert Response
Frank mentioned the union card and that's spot on. One thing I'd add from cases I've worked... the Long Beach Naval Shipyard specifically has been named in a significant number of asbestos trust claims, so there may be established exposure records already on file that don't require you to track down coworkers at all. Some of the asbestos bankruptcy trusts, Owens Corning filed in 2000, Johns Manville before that, maintain historical employment databases. Your attorney may be able to pull documentation you didn't even know existed. The pay stubs are a starting point but they're rarely the whole story. Consult with someone who handles these specifically, because trust claims and civil litigation have different procedural timelines and you'd want to know which path makes sense before the California two-year window gets tight.
3 found this helpful
Attorney Expert Response
Frank's point about union records is spot on, and I'd add one thing nobody's mentioned yet: the shipyard itself may still have employment records on file. Long Beach Naval Shipyard closed in 1997 but its records transferred to federal archives, and I've had cases where we pulled exposure documentation from NARA requests that the family had no idea still existed.

The other thing worth knowing... California also has a "discovery rule" wrinkle. If your FIL wasn't formally diagnosed until 8 months ago but symptoms were documented earlier by a physician, some defendants have argued the clock started then. It's rare that it changes outcomes but worth flagging to whatever attorney you consult, just so there are no surprises later.

Talk to your own attorney about your specific situation before assuming anything I've said here applies cleanly to your FIL's case.
3 found this helpful
Patient
The clock typically starts from diagnosis, not exposure, which is actually good news for your timeline, but you really need to talk to someone who specializes in these cases because state laws vary and I don't want you relying on internet info for something this important. You're right to be thinking about it even while in treatment mode because deadlines don't care about what else is going on.

Share Your Experience

Sign in or create a free account to share your experience.

Discussions in this community are for informational and emotional support purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, medical advice, or an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. Community Guidelines

Call Now: (800) 400-1805 Free Case Review • Available 24/7