Skip to main content

is meso always a death sentence or are there actually people beating this thing

Veteran · · 1,676 views
Got diagnosed October and I'm not gonna lie, first thing I did was google and that was a mistake. Everything says terminal, stage II, blah blah. But I'm seeing people on here who are years out and still fighting so I gotta ask straight up. Is the internet just being dramatic or is there actually a real shot at this.

I had the surgery in December at Balboa Naval Medical Center and my oncologist keeps saying the aggressive approach is the play but I don't know if that's just what they tell you to keep you moving forward. Had pleural, asbestos exposure at Camp Lejeune back in 78 to 82, barracks were basically insulation wrapped in skin, and I was on the Iwo Jima for a couple years too so I've had plenty of time to sit with this.

I'm not looking for false hope here. I just need to know if there's actually people surviving this or if I'm just in denial. What's the real picture from people who've actually been through treatment.

12 Replies

Family
yeah there are definitely people beating it, I know someone who's three years out from diagnosis and still working full-time. your doctors aren't just saying that aggressive stuff to keep you moving, it actually does make a difference especially at stage II. the internet fear-mongering is real but it's not the whole story.
Veteran
That's good to hear, honestly. Three years out and working full-time is the kind of thing I needed to see instead of just the worst case scenarios. My oncologist mentioned multimodal treatment like you said and I guess I'm starting to believe maybe they're not just running me through the motions. Did your contact have the surgery too or did they go a different route?
Veteran
Got my diagnosis same month you did, June though. Stage II pleural, had the pleurectomy in August at Eastern Virginia Medical Center and I'm four months out now. Doing okay, no complaints about the recovery honestly. The aggressive route is not them blowing smoke, J. I went in thinking worst case scenario and my surgeon was straight with me about what we were dealing with. He didn't sugarcoat it but he also didn't paint it all doom either. What he said was "we catch it now, we go after it hard, we see where we are in six months." That's the play.

Real talk though, the difference between me and some guys I've talked to on here is we caught it early enough that surgery was actually on the table. Not everyone gets that option. Camp Lejeune and the Iwo Jima both, that's rough exposure over years not months. But you're still in the fight and your docs are recommending aggressive treatment which means they see something worth fighting for. I wasn't in denial after my surgery, I was just tired and mad and dealing with drains and all that stuff. The denial part comes later when you're feeling better and your brain tries to pretend it didn't happen. That's when you gotta stay disciplined with the follow-ups and scans.
Medical Expert Response
What William said about multimodal treatment is worth sitting with. The 2022 MARS-2 trial data actually shifted how a lot of oncology teams think about sequencing chemo with surgery, and survival curves for stage II pleural have moved meaningfully in the last decade. Not cured, but meaningfully. Your oncologist pushing aggressive isn't just encouragement, there's actual data behind it now.

And honestly, twelve years doing this work, the patients I've seen do best are the ones who asked exactly the question you just asked. Not looking for comfort, looking for the real picture. That psychological clarity matters more than people think, it keeps you engaged in your own care in a way that passive hope doesn't.

The Camp Lejeune exposure timeline you described, 78 to 82, puts you in a cohort the VA has studied extensively so make sure your team knows your full service history if they don't already. Sometimes that context changes which clinical trials you qualify for.
3 found this helpful
Medical Expert Response
Your oncologist isn't just keeping you moving forward. The data actually backs up the aggressive approach, especially for pleural meso caught at stage II.

The MARS 2 trial published in The Lancet in 2021 got a lot of attention because it questioned extended pleurectomy, but what gets less press is that the patients with the best long-term outcomes across multiple studies are consistently the ones who went in hard early, surgery plus chemo plus sometimes radiation depending on margins. There are people years out. Real ones, not statistical flukes. The median survival numbers you're seeing online are pulled from datasets that include late-stage diagnoses, older treatments, and patients who weren't surgical candidates. They're not your number.

What I tell patients who ask me this directly, and I respect you for asking it directly, is that "terminal" and "right now" are two very different things and the internet doesn't know the difference. Your specific situation matters enormously. Histology (the cell type under the microscope), whether they got clean margins in December, your current lung function, all of it changes the picture significantly.

Camp Lejeune exposures are well-documented and the VA has been recognizing meso as a presumptive service-connected condition since 2021, so if you haven't gone that route for benefits and coverage, that's worth a conversation.

Talk to your oncologist about where your margins landed and whether multimodal therapy (combining more than one treatment type) is still on the table. That specific conversation is the one that matters most right now.
3 found this helpful
Veteran
That MARS 2 thing is exactly what's been eating at me, actually. My oncologist mentioned it but then explained why they're still pushing the aggressive route for my case and I appreciate you laying out what actually matters in those numbers. Most places I read just headline the trial without the context of who actually lived longer.

So when you say the best outcomes are the aggressive approach early, you're saying that's what they're doing with me right now is the right call? Because I want to believe that but I also know doctors gotta stay optimistic to keep you compliant.
Attorney Expert Response
Not a doctor so please take this for what it is, but in 20 years of asbestos litigation I've sat across the table from a lot of mesothelioma patients and I've watched some of them outlive the statistics by years. Not a few. Enough that I stopped treating survival numbers as predictions a long time ago.

The median numbers you're reading online, the 12 to 21 months figures, those pool together everyone, including people who were already stage IV when diagnosed and people in their 80s who couldn't tolerate aggressive treatment. You had surgery in December. That's not nothing. Patients who are candidates for surgery and actually get it tend to skew well above those medians.

Camp Lejeune exposure specifically is something I've handled many times. The contamination timeline you're describing, 78 to 82, puts you squarely in the window covered under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022. That's a separate lane from a typical asbestos trust claim and it may matter for you depending on where you are with VA benefits and other coverage.

But honestly the thing I keep coming back to in cases like yours is that the guys who push for second opinions and get into mesothelioma specialist centers tend to have different outcomes than the ones who just accept the first plan. I had a client back in 2019 who was told six months, got a second opinion at a dedicated meso program, ended up in a clinical trial. He testified at a deposition two years later.

Please consult an attorney familiar with your specific situation, and same goes for getting a specialist's eyes on your treatment plan if you haven't already.
3 found this helpful
Family
Joe got his diagnosis back in September and honestly my first Google search made me want to throw my laptop across the room. Everything was so bleak and final sounding, like they'd already written the obituary you know? But then we started connecting with people on forums like this and it was like someone turned the lights back on.

The aggressive approach your oncologist is talking about... that's actually the thing that seems to be making a difference. Joe did surgery plus chemotherapy and then immunotherapy starting in November. Is it brutal? Absolutely. Some days he can barely get off the couch and I'm doing all the cooking and honestly managing his meds feels like planning lesson plans for 150 kids all over again. But here's what I know for sure: there ARE people years out from diagnosis who are still here. Not in denial, just living.

The thing that got me was realizing that "terminal" doesn't mean "tomorrow." It means the cancer is advanced, not that the clock is wound up and ticking. Joe's oncologist at Tampa General was really straight with us about survival rates improving with multimodal treatment, especially when people catch it at stage II like you did. Camp Lejeune exposure... yeah, we've talked to a lot of people with that same exposure history and some of them are doing surprisingly well.

What I'd say is don't discount what your doctors are telling you about being aggressive. We questioned it constantly at first but then we saw the scan improvements and it changed everything. You're not in denial, you're being realistic about the fact that this isn't automatically a done deal like Google wants you to believe.

How are you handling the treatment side effects so far?
Veteran
Yeah that part about the lights turning back on really hits home. I've been doing the same thing, bouncing between forums trying to find people who didn't just disappear after six months. Sounds like Joe's oncologist and mine are singing the same song about going hard on it, which is good to hear from someone actually living it and not just reading studies. How far out is Joe now from his surgery and how's he handling the chemo side of things? That's the part I'm still wrapping my head around.
Family
Hey, I'm really glad you're asking this because my mom was stage III when she got diagnosed in August and I've been down that google rabbit hole too. It's terrifying and yeah, a lot of the results are worst case scenarios. But here's what I've actually seen: people DO survive this. Not everyone, I'm not gonna lie to you like that, but the aggressive treatment approach your oncologist is talking about? That's real.

My mom did chemo, then surgery at MD Anderson in January, and she's still here. Still fighting. Some days are hard, some days she feels almost normal. We have bad scans and good scans. The point is she's not gone and she's not just waiting to die. She's living.

What I've learned is that your attitude about the aggressive approach matters more than you'd think. Like, my mom was skeptical at first too but her team kept explaining WHY they were pushing hard and it actually made sense. Surgery, chemo, clinical trials if you can get in, all of it can buy you time and quality of life. That's not false hope, that's just what happens when you actually fight instead of just accepting the diagnosis.

You had surgery in December so you're already doing it. That's huge. Keep pushing forward with your oncologist's plan even when it sucks. I see my students doing these resilience projects in class and honestly the cancer patients I've read about on here have more grit than most people I know.

You're not in denial. You're realistic and you're fighting. That matters.
Family
Joe was diagnosed stage III back in September, so I get why you're doing the doom scroll thing. That first week I probably read every worst case scenario on the internet and it was honestly just making everything worse. The thing is, those survival stories you're seeing on here, they're real. We're not some magical exception or anything. Joe's been doing immunotherapy since November and yeah, some days are rough but he's still here and still fighting and his scans have been stable.

Your oncologist isn't just blowing smoke to keep you moving. The aggressive approach actually works for some people, especially when you catch it early enough to do surgery like you did. We met with three different specialists before settling on Joe's treatment plan and they all said basically the same thing, so that helped us feel like we weren't just getting sold a bill of goods, you know?

The hardest part for me was accepting that this isn't binary like I taught for 32 years where you either pass the test or you don't. This is way messier than that. Some people get years, some get more, some don't respond the way we hope. But that doesn't mean the fight isn't worth it or that aggressive treatment doesn't matter. It absolutely does. The people who are years out, they did the surgery, they did the chemo or immunotherapy or whatever their team recommended, and they showed up for it even when it sucked.

You caught it at stage II which is honestly better odds than Joe had. And you had surgery at a good facility. That puts you in a different spot than the internet doom stories. Just keep talking to your doctors and don't be afraid to ask the hard questions about what your specific situation looks like...

How are you feeling about starting treatment?
Patient
I'm peritoneal Stage II diagnosed November, so we're pretty close in timeline. The short answer is yes, people are beating this thing, but it requires the aggressive approach your oncologist is talking about and honestly a lot of luck with biology and timing.

I've been deep in the literature since my diagnosis because that's how I cope, and the multimodal treatment studies show median survival around 5 years for Stage II peritoneal when you do surgery plus chemotherapy plus HIPEC. That's not nothing. Some people are pushing 10, 15 years out. The Sugarbaker procedure data from centers that do high volume has better outcomes than the general statistics would suggest, so where you get treated matters enormously.

What I found helpful was looking at survival curves instead of just the median number. Like yes, median is 5 years but that means some people are on the left side of that curve and some are on the right, and the right side gets longer every year as protocols improve. I have my surgery scheduled for February and my team at Cleveland Clinic was very clear that the goal is cytoreduction to near zero disease and aggressive chemo after. That's not just keeping me moving forward, that's actually the standard that extends survival.

The internet being dramatic is real. The worst cases get googled first. People who are 8 years out from diagnosis aren't writing about it as much because they're living their lives. I follow the peritoneal mesothelioma research pretty closely now and there are definitely people talking about quality of life beyond just survival time, which to me means the aggressive approach is actually working.

Your Camp Lejeune exposure and the timeline adds up with mine from Johns-Manville. That's a lot of years for fibers to do their work. But you caught it at Stage II and had surgery already so you're actually ahead of some people I've read about. How are you feeling post-op recovery wise?

Share Your Experience

Sign in or create a free account to share your experience.

Discussions in this community are for informational and emotional support purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, medical advice, or an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. Community Guidelines

Call Now: (800) 400-1805 Free Case Review • Available 24/7