Skip to main content

how much asbestos actually gives you meso - is there a safe amount

Family · · 26 views
Joe's doctor said he probably got exposed sometime in the 70s or 80s when he was doing HVAC work, but honestly nobody knows exactly when or how much. That's what's been driving me crazy about all this.

I keep reading stuff online that says there's no safe level and then other stuff that says it depends on how long you were around it. But like, some people work with asbestos their whole lives and don't get sick, right? And then Joe gets one exposure or maybe a few and he's got stage 3 pleural meso. So what actually makes the difference.

I was a teacher for 32 years so I get that exposure is dose and duration but this feels different because it seems so random. His buddy worked the same jobs and he's fine. Joe's not fine.

Does anyone actually know if there's a threshold or is it just the luck of the draw with your genetics or something? Like did your doctor ever explain what probably caused yours?

10 Replies

Family
honestly that randomness part is what gets me too, my mom was exposed back in the 60s working in a building and her coworkers are still around but she's the one dealing with this. nobody can tell us why her body reacted that way and theirs didn't, it's maddening.
Patient
Yeah man, I get the frustration. Spent 30 years around brake dust and asbestos insulation in cars and never thought twice about it. Then boom, Stage I pleural back in December and suddenly I'm the guy who has to figure out what went wrong.

Honest truth? My oncologist at Henry Ford told me there's no magic number. She said some people inhale fibers their whole career and nothing happens, other people get unlucky real quick. Something about how your body processes it, your genetics, maybe even how deep you breathe when you're around it. I wasn't exactly taking shallow breaths when I was under a car in July without a mask, you know.

What got me thinking different was when she mentioned that one bad exposure to really nasty stuff can sometimes be enough if the fibers are the right type and they land in the right spot in your lungs. It's not just about quantity, it's also about the quality of the exposure. The HVAC guys in the 70s and 80s were probably dealing with raw asbestos in duct wrap and pipe insulation - that stuff was way more dangerous than what I got breathing brake dust through a garage.

Joe's buddy probably just got luckier. Same job, same era, different outcome. Genetics, immune system, how much he actually inhaled during specific jobs, all of it matters. My doc basically said trying to figure out the exact exposure is like trying to remember which specific day in 1987 you got a cold. Doesn't really change the treatment plan anyway.

The random part sucks but that's kinda how I'm trying to look at it now. Can't change what happened, just gotta deal with what is.
Medical ✓ Expert Response
What you're describing, that maddening randomness, is something I hear from families all the time and it genuinely never gets easier to sit with.

So here's what the research actually shows, and I'll try not to make it sound like a textbook. There's no established safe threshold for asbestos exposure. The WHO and IARC both classify all fiber types as carcinogenic with no lower "safe" limit confirmed. But you're also right that dose and duration matter. The longer and more intense the exposure, generally the higher the risk. HVAC work in the 70s was particularly bad because the materials being disturbed often had very high amphibole fiber content, which the research consistently links to pleural meso specifically.

But then there's the part that still doesn't add up neatly. Genetic susceptibility is real. There's a mutation in something called the BAP1 gene that significantly increases a person's risk even at lower exposures. We actually had a patient at our cancer center who was tested for this after her diagnosis in early 2019 and it changed how her oncologist approached surveillance for her family members. Worth asking Joe's oncologist whether germline testing has been discussed, though of course that's a conversation for his specific care team.

The "Joe's buddy is fine" thing... I know that feels like proof of randomness, and honestly it kind of is. Same exposure, different bodies, different outcomes. That's genuinely hard to accept. If the guilt or the "why Joe" spiral is becoming persistent for you, talking to someone who works specifically in oncology social work can help. Not because something is wrong with you, just because this kind of uncertainty is its own specific kind of grief.
2 found this helpful
Family
Yeah, that randomness is exactly what gets to me. Joe keeps saying "why me and not my coworkers" and I don't have an answer for him, you know? I was trying to make sense of it like I used to explain things to my students but this one just doesn't have a neat lesson plan. So if there's no safe threshold like you're saying, does that mean his one exposure or few exposures was just incredibly unlucky, or is there something about his body that made him more susceptible? Like genetics or immune system stuff?
Attorney ✓ Expert Response
This question comes up in almost every case I've handled over 20 years, and the honest answer is that the science doesn't give us a clean threshold. The EPA and OSHA have both taken the position since at least the 1980s that there is no established safe level for asbestos exposure, and the research generally supports that. But you're right that it feels random because it kind of is, at the biological level.

What we do know is that chrysotile vs. amphibole fiber type matters a lot. Amphibole fibers, which were common in HVAC insulation materials through the 70s, are more biopersistent, meaning they don't clear from lung tissue the way other fibers do. Joe's exposure window fits that profile almost exactly.

And here's the part that drives people crazy... individual susceptibility is real. There's research suggesting genetic factors in BAP1 and other tumor suppressor genes may explain why two guys doing the same job for the same years end up with completely different outcomes. Joe's buddy being fine doesn't mean Joe did anything wrong or had more exposure necessarily.

From a legal standpoint this matters too. Courts in most jurisdictions have moved toward a "each significant exposure" standard rather than requiring proof of a single causative event, which is good for cases like Joe's where the exposure history is documented but diffuse. California and New York have fairly well developed case law on this.

Consult an attorney for your specific situation, but the lack of a precise exposure date or amount doesn't necessarily close the door on anything.
2 found this helpful
Family
Yeah, that makes sense about the fiber types... I guess Joe's doctor never got into that level of detail with us, just said asbestos and moved on. So when you say amphibole is worse, does that mean some exposures are actually less dangerous than others, or is that just splitting hairs at this point? I'm trying to understand if there's anything we should have been doing differently back then, or if it was just inevitable once he was around it at all.
Veteran
Look, the docs told me the same thing. Probably picked it up on the Oriskany sometime between 71 and 91 when I was working hull spaces, but nobody keeps records that detailed from back then. Could've been one bad exposure or could've been accumulated over years. Either way here I am.

What I learned from my oncologist at the VA is that it's not just about how much or how long. It's the fibers themselves and where they lodge in your lungs, plus your genetics, plus whether your body can clear them out efficiently. Some guys are just built different I guess. Joe's buddy might still get sick in five years or might never get it. That's the thing that keeps people up at night.

The "no safe level" thing is true in the sense that even one fiber can theoretically cause problems if it gets in the right spot and your immune system can't handle it. But statistically yeah some people get exposed and never develop anything. Doesn't mean there's a safe threshold though. It just means luck is involved and doctors hate admitting that.

What helped me stop spinning on this was focusing on what happens next instead of why it happened. Got my second opinion at a different VA facility in August before my pleurectomy. Different surgeon, same recommendation basically. That took some of the randomness feeling out of it. Not much but some.

The genetics piece is real though. Ask Joe if anyone in his family history had lung issues or cancer. Mine did and that probably didn't help my odds.
Family
Yeah, this is something I've wrestled with constantly since my dad got diagnosed. The randomness is the part that keeps me up at night honestly.

So from what I've learned working in healthcare and then diving deep into this stuff after March, there's no real safe threshold. Period. The research is pretty clear on that. But here's what makes it complicated: asbestos causes mesothelioma through a mechanism we still don't fully understand. It's not like dose-response in the traditional toxicology sense where more exposure equals more risk in a linear way. A single fiber can theoretically cause it, or someone can have decades of exposure and never develop it. The latency is brutal too, which is why your husband's buddy could be totally fine right now and develop symptoms ten years from now. We're talking 10-50 years sometimes.

My dad worked HVAC in the 70s and early 80s, similar timeline to Joe. His pulmonologist at Northwestern actually told us that occupational exposure during that era was basically unavoidable if you were doing any kind of building work. The insulation products weren't labeled properly, contractors weren't informed, workers weren't protected. So there's probably way more exposure than anyone realizes.

The genetic component is real though. Some people have polymorphisms that make them more susceptible to malignant transformation of mesothelial cells. We don't test for it routinely and honestly it wouldn't change anything at this point, but it's why two people in the same job can have completely different outcomes. It's infuriating because it genuinely is partly luck.

What I've found most helpful is just accepting that we'll never know exactly what tipped it for dad. Some days I'm okay with that and some days I'm not.
Family
That healthcare background probably helps you cut through all the conflicting stuff way more than I could. And yeah, the "we still don't fully understand it" part is what gets me... like I can teach a kid the water cycle but nobody can really explain why Joe's body reacted this way and his coworker's didn't. Did your dad's doctors ever give him any kind of explanation about what they thought triggered it, or was it mostly just "yeah, asbestos did this"?
Patient
I've spent a lot of time with this exact question since my diagnosis in November. The frustrating answer is that both things are kind of true, which doesn't help anyone sleep at night.

There's no established safe threshold, but exposure risk isn't purely linear either. I worked at the Johns-Manville plant in Cleveland from 1978 to 1985, so seven years of pretty consistent exposure to asbestos insulation products. My pulmonologist said the latency period for peritoneal meso averages 30-40 years, which tracks with my timeline. But here's what nobody really talks about: individual susceptibility varies wildly. Some people's immune systems or genetic makeup just handles the fiber burden differently. It's not entirely random but it's also not fully predictable.

The dose-response relationship exists, absolutely. Higher exposure and longer duration increase your statistical risk. But you can also get unlucky with lower exposure depending on fiber type, size, and how deep into your lungs or peritoneum they travel. Chrysotile versus crocidolite matters. Occupational versus environmental matters. One intense exposure to friable asbestos could theoretically be worse than years of lower-level contact.

Joe's buddy might genuinely have had less exposure during those same jobs, or different job tasks, or his genetics just gave him better protection. That's not comforting but it's the actual science. I've been reviewing studies from the American Journal of Industrial Medicine and the data shows about 5-15% of heavily exposed workers develop mesothelioma, which means 85-95% don't. That's cold comfort when you're the 5%.

What did his doctor say about his specific exposure circumstances? The type of work matters a lot for understanding where those fibers actually went.

Share Your Experience

Sign in or create a free account to share your experience.

Discussions in this community are for informational and emotional support purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, medical advice, or an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. Community Guidelines

Call Now: (800) 400-1805 Free Case Review • Available 24/7